Posted by: Teacherman () on Wed Oct 13 07:46:58 2004

>>> Hi Jack,
> > > > > > > > I would like to inform you that the angle adjustment does fit in the 8-12 degrees that has been defined.This angle is applied by a lever on the new angle adjustment that has been incorporated to the device.I would like to say that this has improved the product.I would also like to say that DUSTY BAKER ,and REGGIE SMITH APPROVE OF THIS DEVICE.I would like to talk to you again .(513)616-3611 ERIK LASEKE <<<
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Erik
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I will give you a call when I get back to the office.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Note: I met with Reggie Smith when he has the batting coach with the Dodgers. I found his knowledge of swing mechanics noticeably lacking. He believed strongly that the energy for the swing came from the forward movement of the batter’s weight during the swing. Even when I showed him a frame-by-frame of Bonds rotating around a stationary axis, he refused to accept what he saw. When I pointed out that Bonds axis actually faded AWAY from the pitcher during his swing – his reply suggested I must have doctored the tape.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Jack Mankin
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Teacherman. I said " Teacherman, maybe I misunderstood your position. In the past you have spent a lot of time offering advice to the gad of "my DD". I thought for sure you had advised him to have "my DD" use this device. Furthermore, you advised him to have "my DD" "stay connected" and use "flail", which is essentially terms describing top hand torque. If I am misinterpreting your postion please reconcile your statements and/or straighten me out. Thanks!
> > > > > > > You responded "What is a gad?....."
> > > > > > > Answer: it was a typo. Sorry, you have told the DAD (not gad) of "my DD" numerous times that she should use flail and connection.Now I am really confused because flail and connection are exactly what top hand torque is, the only difference being that Jack has popularized the term top hand torque.Please clarify your remarks because if tht is good advice for "my DD", and if Barry Bonds uses tht, why are you now backing off your comments? It seems like you spend a lot of time and effort helping out "my DD" at the other site, so I would appreciate it if you could clarify your remarks. Thank you so much and sorry for the typo!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As I posted below, provide the link to where I suggested your DD use THT. Everyone here knows I don't believe THT exists.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And, since it doesn't exist, it can't be one and the same as flail and connection, which do exist.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Show us the link.......or.......apologize for lying.
> > > > >
> > > > > You said at mechanics.com that bow arch, tht, connection and flail were the same thing, but you thought Mike Epstein deserved the credit, not Jack.All I did was ask you a question. You don't have to be mean to me a call me a liar. I'm 17 years old and i just want to learn, that's all.Sorry for bothering you.
> > > >
> > > > See above.
> > >
> > > Teacherman instead of picking on a 17 year old I think you should be explaining your inconsistencies. For example you stated that top hand torque does not exist, and yet you can not explain why Bonds, Walker, Macgwire, Martinez and all the other power hitters have been so sucessful using Jack's methods.
> >
> > Son, don't come to the men's room unless you are a man.....You are the one who attacked me with untrue statements. I've asked you to post the link to my alleged comments. You can't. Now you want to play "woe is me. I'm only 17. Quit picking on me". Grow up. Take it somewhere else.
> >
> > And, you're right, I did say THT doesn't exist. I've already admitted that. And it's true. Now, find the link where I said THT and bow arch and connection and flail are all the same thing.
>
> All I can say is that all of your posts are out there and all the 17 year old did was to ask you to clarify your remarks. In the future, if you can't back up your statements you shouldn't be making them. On the one hand you say tht bow arch and flail are the same thing, then you say tht doesn't exist. By that logic, bow arch and flail do not exist either! Remember, I have read your posts at the other sites as well. Now, if you want to attack me for calling you on your inconsistencies, so be it, but lay off the 17 year old, she did nothing to you.

The 17 yr old didn't just ask for a clarification. She accused me of saying tht and flail and connection and the rest are the same thing. That wasn't said. She/He can't find the post. It didn't happen. That is as clear as it can get. I didn't say it. They can't find it. That is clear.

Now, you are saying I said the same thing. You are taking the statement that I've been accused of saying and using it to make a point. Great logic. So, if you are now accusing me of saying the same thing, then you find the post........or say you're sorry.