[ About ]
[ Batspeed Research ]
[ Swing Mechanics ]
[ Truisms and Fallacies ]
[ Discussion Board ]
[ Video ]
[ Other Resources ]
[ Contact Us ]
Re: Re: Re: the hook


Posted by: Jack Mankin (MrBatspeed@aol.com) on Tue Jan 25 15:22:03 2005


>>> There is something else going on during this point in the swing. The hips and shoulders decelerate sending the arms ahead of the hips. It's called the whip affect.

I have several views of the same swing from the back and side views and they tell different tale. The riew view it look like the hook affect is how you explained it. In the side view you can see the whip affect and the arms accelerated past and around the rotating body. <<<

Hi Shawn

I stated in a previous post that I had no problem with calling the flinging of the hands into a circular path a whipping effect. I do have a problem with some of Dr. Yeager’s conclusions regarding his definition of a whip effect.

He states, “If forward momentum is not stopped and if body segments turn at the same time, maximal energy transfer will not result. If one were to attempt to crack a whip by rotating in a circle without stopping the hand, and therefore not transferring energy, the goal of cracking the whip would not be attained. However, if we stop the whip and then allow the whip to sequentially stop down the line, then we'll get the desired result.”

You just stated, “The hips and shoulders decelerate sending the arms ahead of the hips. It's called the whip affect.” According to Dr.Yeager, the transfer of energy from the whip does not occur until hip and shoulder rotation has stopped (“if we stop the whip and then allow the whip to sequentially stop down the line, then we'll get the desired result”). This is true when cracking a bullwhip but is it a correct analogy for swinging a ridged bat – I think not.

By the definition of his analogy, there is no transfer of energy to accelerate the bat around the swing plane until the shoulders stop. I would contend just the opposite is true. I would say that when the shoulder stops (105 degree position), the bat should have already been accelerated to contact – not just starting to accelerate.

He states, “If one were to attempt to crack a whip by rotating in a circle without stopping the hand, and therefore not transferring energy, the goal of cracking the whip would not be attained.” I agree, you do not “crack a whip” by keeping the hands accelerating in a circular path. However, unlike his “whipping action”, an angular displacement rate of the hands does induce an angular displacement rate to a ridged bat in the baseball swing from initiation to contact. Like swinging a ball around on a string, you do not need to stop the hand to accelerate the bat-head.

Jack Mankin


Followups:

Post a followup:
Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Text:

Anti-Spambot Question:
Three strikes is an _____________?
   Homerun
   Out
   Stolen base
   Touchdown

   
[   SiteMap   ]