[ About ]
[ Batspeed Research ]
[ Swing Mechanics ]
[ Truisms and Fallacies ]
[ Discussion Board ]
[ Video ]
[ Other Resources ]
[ Contact Us ]
Observations from ten years of posts

Posted by: Steve (stephen.laflamme@bestbuy.com) on Wed Apr 28 23:31:36 2010

Hello all,

My 8 year old will be attending one of the area's Epstein-certified instructors for a seven-day hitting course at the conclusion of his season before fall ball. I wanted to learn more about the rotational swing, so I checked out his work, Englishbey's, and any other study I could find about rotational hitting. I found this site just a few months ago, and have spent dozens of mornings and afternoons reading the material, viewing clips, and reading posts while commuting an hour to and from work. Jack's study represents in my opinion the absolute best combination of physics, common sense, and lucid explanation I've found.
I've literally read every post relevant to mechanics (skipping over off-topic stuff). Just a few observations:

1. Old habits die hard and people see things on video to support long-standing beliefs they hold, even when the truth is right in front of them. Countless posters refute Jack, only to be shown proof in video and in physics to the contrary.

2. Players and coaches can be distinguished in the posts by the way they describe the mechanics. It seems the more accomplished the player, the more "feel", and "cues" (which may be linear and inefficient even though their swing is not) dominate the description, while a developing player will be more apt to seek mechanical advice. Coaches tend to be even more mechanical as we struggle to find ways to teach swings we were never taught.

3. What put it "all together", for me, were the 3 posts titled "putting round pegs ins square holes", or something to that effect, posted in early November 2008. In my mind the only poster through the years who successfully presented a contrary MECHANICAL view was T. Guerry, and though the differences they ultimately share now, I believe, are minor (tilting shoulders ans rotating forearms to load and aid THT and create separation vs. "pulling the strings" and turning the shoulder to do the same, and the resulting poaaible small change in the CHP caused by a more tilted rotation of the shoulder), it really helped reconcile some problems I and my son had with PLT/THT and bat lag as I attempted to coach my son with us both hitting balls. Yes, Teacherman first presented the "concept", but I felt his description was not teachable, and he'd been disrespectful to Jack, who always kept his cool. Even before those posts, just from what I'd read and taught to my son, he improved dramtically. Just getting him to explode the front shoulder solved (with lots of reps) a few years of poor instruction on my part, as I ate some humble pie. Anyway, those three posts summarized (starting and ending with Jack) in the most clear way to me what the site is all about. For anyone still confused, or not 100 percent sure that the material on the site represents the high-level mechanics, check it out.

4. PFO is dead (lol) but we all love BHL.

Anyway I've rambled on a bit, but thanks Jack and all, keep up the great work!



Post a followup:

Anti-Spambot Question:
This is known as hitting for the cycle in a game?
   Single, double, triple, homerun
   Four singles
   Three homeruns
   Three stikeouts

[   SiteMap   ]