[ About ]
[ Batspeed Research ]
[ Swing Mechanics ]
[ Truisms and Fallacies ]
[ Discussion Board ]
[ Video ]
[ Other Resources ]
[ Contact Us ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Jack, you now agree?


Posted by: Major Dan (markj89@charter.net) on Wed Dec 5 13:15:00 2001


>>>My post of 11-29-2001 responded to your questions(regarding my posts on arm/hand strength).
> > > > >
> > > > > Did I answer your questions to your satisfaction and are we now in full agreement? <<<
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi HitMan
> > > > >
> > > > > If you meant that the hands should stay back and allow shoulder rotation and the batís reaction to torque to accelerate the hand-path -- instead of extending the arms. Then we are in full agreement.
> > > > >
> > > > > Jack Mankin
> > > >
> > > > Jack,
> > > >
> > > > You have know idea what you are talking about.
> > > >
> > > > Joe A.
> > > > >
> > >
> > > Who is the "you" to which you, Joe A., are referring, Jack or Hitman?
> > >
> > > By the way, I'm still waiting for that link to your website.
> > >
> > > Also, when you say "know idea", is that a mispelling or something clever I'm not getting? Either way, you are great entertainment. Keep it up.
> > >
> > > Mark H.
> >
> > Hey Joe (A) -
> > what happened to ThePitchingMound.com? It's been down for days. Why don't you get it up and running again? And why do the people there deny ever hearing of you?
>
> Hey, what does it take for you to understand, someone was imposturing me. That sight is even more litewait than this sight.

Thanks for the clarification. After consulting my dictionary and exploring creative spelling variations, I do understand what you are trying to say. Unfortunately I thought I was talking to the imposture!


Followups:

Post a followup:
Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Text:

Anti-Spambot Question:
How many innings in an MLB game?
   4
   3
   9
   2

   
[   SiteMap   ]