[ About ]
[ Batspeed Research ]
[ Swing Mechanics ]
[ Truisms and Fallacies ]
[ Discussion Board ]
[ Video ]
[ Other Resources ]
[ Contact Us ]
Re: An Alternative Option


Posted by: Roy () on Tue May 4 07:48:00 2004


One more thing: is the back arm really the dominant arm, Jack?
> Right now, I am just waiting for Jack's response...
> >
> > Hi BHl
> >
> > Yes, I would definitely say the back-arm is dominant with most batters.
> >
> > As far as your main topic, I would never recommend changing batting sides for the reasons you outlined. For me it would not be an option.That is just my opinion from observing players trying to become switch hitters.
> >
> > Jack Mankin
> >
> > Hi Jacks,
>
> Thanks for the response.
>
> I have stated my reasons, and fail to see the problem in doing what I suggested.
>
> Yet, I have another alternative for right-handed hitters who throw righty. How about instead of teaching them to tuck the back elbow in, with the intention of delivering a boxing-like punch at the ball, you teach them to tuck, then contract the back arm (i.e., squeeze the biceps towards the forearm) throughout the swing.
>
> It seems that using these mechanics will allow the hitter attain an "L" position in the back forearm at contact.
>
> Sincerely,
> BHL

BHL I'm not sure I follow everything you are saying but I will commend you on your approach. It's good to come up with ideas. Some may be good, some may be bad, but as long as the ideas are discussed without sarcasm and insults creeping in , that's great. One thing I have noticed is that there are some individuals who always seem to have a reason to attack anything that anyone says, yet these same individuals never seem to have any ideas of their own. You are indeed positive and not negative, a breath of fresh air.


Followups:

Post a followup:
Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Text:

Anti-Spambot Question:
This MLB Stadium is in Boston?
   Yankees park
   Three Rivers
   Safeco Park
   Fenway Park

   
[   SiteMap   ]