[ About ]
[ Batspeed Research ]
[ Swing Mechanics ]
[ Truisms and Fallacies ]
[ Discussion Board ]
[ Video ]
[ Other Resources ]
[ Contact Us ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Jack, you now agree?


Posted by: Major Dan (markj89@charter.net) on Wed Dec 5 12:38:13 2001


>>>My post of 11-29-2001 responded to your questions(regarding my posts on arm/hand strength).
> > >
> > > Did I answer your questions to your satisfaction and are we now in full agreement? <<<
> > >
> > > Hi HitMan
> > >
> > > If you meant that the hands should stay back and allow shoulder rotation and the bat’s reaction to torque to accelerate the hand-path -- instead of extending the arms. Then we are in full agreement.
> > >
> > > Jack Mankin
> >
> > Jack,
> >
> > You have know idea what you are talking about.
> >
> > Joe A.
> > >
>
> Who is the "you" to which you, Joe A., are referring, Jack or Hitman?
>
> By the way, I'm still waiting for that link to your website.
>
> Also, when you say "know idea", is that a mispelling or something clever I'm not getting? Either way, you are great entertainment. Keep it up.
>
> Mark H.

Hey Joe (A) -
what happened to ThePitchingMound.com? It's been down for days. Why don't you get it up and running again? And why do the people there deny ever hearing of you?


Followups:

Post a followup:
Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Text:

Anti-Spambot Question:
This is known as hitting for the cycle in a game?
   Single, double, triple, homerun
   Four singles
   Three homeruns
   Three stikeouts

   
[   SiteMap   ]